tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3137524909094656245.post3919013891675448827..comments2023-10-17T02:08:37.051-07:00Comments on Language Nerds: Syntax or Lexicon?aislin!http://www.blogger.com/profile/02645618404413641842noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3137524909094656245.post-3942167091295321752007-11-18T07:53:00.000-08:002007-11-18T07:53:00.000-08:00You know, that's exactly what Borer ended up sayin...You know, that's exactly what Borer ended up saying! <BR/><BR/>In her framework there is an AspP, which must be "assigned range" by some element that is non-homogenous. This makes AspP "well-formed," and a well-formed AspP results in a telic interpretation. <BR/><BR/>Atelic interpretations are associated with the lack of a well-formed AspP. So this could fall out either from the lack of AspP, or meagan louiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08963362791440378566noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3137524909094656245.post-61475966578053893932007-11-16T19:49:00.000-08:002007-11-16T19:49:00.000-08:00Well, I have two thoughts on this:1. I find the id...Well, I have two thoughts on this:<BR/><BR/>1. I find the idea of all this internal structure quite compelling. Distributed morphology and the work of Michal Stärke suggest that lexical insertion occurs after syntax. Well, Stärke does at least. I'm not qualified to talk about DM, really. Anyway, Stärke proposes that there's some kind of a matching process between structures and LIs. <BR/><BR/Meaghan Fowliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04855727153351438129noreply@blogger.com